The CUNEO LAW GROUP, PC v. Joseph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining circumstances that led to creation of a settlement agreement to determine the reason for inclusion of a particular clause
• listing whether “extraneous circumstances” caused a breach as a factor relevant to the materiality inquiry
• finding no “unfair bargaining” where the agreement was between a law firm and a lawyer, among other things
• describing Government of Rwanda as supporting conversion liability where “the defendant had received a specific identifiable sum of money from the plaintiffs, did not perform the services required by the contract, and did not return the money when requested to do so by the plaintiffs”
• “However, a claim for conversion of money may not be maintained to enforce a contractual obligation for payment of money.”
• “[A] claim for conversion of money may not be maintained to enforce a contractual obligation for payment of money.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).