Skip to main content
· 8/27/2013

the Crawford Family Farm Partnership v. TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L. P.

Citations

  • 409 S.W.3d 908
  • 181 Oil & Gas Rep. 239
  • 2013 WL 4519769
  • 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 10733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that a pipeline would be a common carrier because there was a \reasonable probability\ it would ship crude petroleum for one or more customers who would retain ownership of the oil
  • determining that a pipeline would be a common carrier because there was a “reasonable probability” it would ship crude petroleum for one or more customers who would retain ownership of the oil
  • determining that a pipeline would be a common carrier because there was a “reasonable probability” it would ship crude petroleum for one or more customers who would retain ownership of the oil

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, Morriss, Moseley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.