The County of Fresno v. Cecil D. Andrus, National Land for People, Inc., Applicant for Intervention-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the proposed intervenors had a protectable interest 9 where they were “precisely those Congress intended to protect” under the law and 10 “precisely those who will be injured” by the defendant’s actions
• finding small farmers had a protectable interest where the 27 farmers were “precisely those Congress intended to protect” with the statute
• “We have rejected the notion that Rule 24(a)(2) re- quires a specific legal or equitable interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).