The Clorox Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Sterling Winthrop, Inc. Reckitt & Colman, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying a rule of reason analysis and rejecting the alleged anticompetitive harm of a trademark agreement
• “There is no evidence that [a party to the challenged agreement] entered the agreement under duress.”
• “Such agreements are common, and favored, under the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).