The City of Indianapolis, Indiana, and the Indianapolis Department of Public Works v. Evelyn Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim under Article 1, section 23 because “no Indiana court has explicitly recognized a private right of action for monetary damages under the Indiana Constitution.”
• “[N]o Indiana court has explicitly recognized a private right of action for monetary damages under the Indiana Constitution.”
• “[N]o Indiana court has explicitly recognized a private right of action for monetary damages under the Indiana Constitution.”
• “[N]o Indiana court has explicitly recognized a private right of action for monetary damages under the Indiana Constitution.”
• “[N]o Indiana court has explicitly recognized a private right of action for monetary damages under the Indiana Constitution.”
• “[N]o Indiana court has explicitly recognized a private right of action for monetary damages under the Indiana Constitution.” (quoting Smith v. Ind. Dep’t of Corr., 871 N.E.2d 975, 985 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).