The City of Atlanta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Commerce abused its discretion in refusing to correct ministerial error, and noting, inter alia, that “[t]he affected U.S. industry is not entitled to [an excessive] remedy”
• holding that it was “an abuse of discretion” for Commerce to refuse to consider cor- rection of errors “because of the ‘untimely’ submission of the corrective information”
• holding that Commerce abused its discretion where its decision not to use a \straightforward mathematical adjustment\ to correct for certain clerical errors led to \the imposition of many millions of dollars in duties not justified under the statute.\
• stating that it is particularly appropriate to permit Commerce to correct clerical errors where court is already remanding for other reasons
• noting that because preliminary results are subject to change, “the tension between finality and correctness simply [does] not exist” during that stage
• recognizing that the antidumping laws are remedial rather than punitive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).