The Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Soo Line Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]ppellants’ assertion” that a harm would “inevitably result” was “too speculative” and thus insufficient to show irreparable harm
• moving party bears the burden to establish the need for injunctive relief
• “[T]he absence of irreparable injury is by itself sufficient to defeat a motion for a preliminary injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).