The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. The United States, the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and the Chickasaw Nation v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an indefinite stay without a “pressing need” was an abuse of discretion
• concluding that an indefinite stay without a “pressing need” was an abuse of discretion
• holding that trial court’s stay was an abuse of discretion because pending actions “may take years to complete” and because proceedings on liability could not be justifiably stayed “merely because a precise determination of damages is not possible at this moment. . .”
• discussing Landis, and suggesting that “balancing test” governs cases where stay sought is “of indefinite duration”
• discussing Landis, and suggesting that \balancing test” governs cases where stay sought is \of indefinite. duration”
• denying a stay where resolution of a prior case was not a necessary precursor to resolution of the case at bar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).