Skip to main content
· 2/5/1971

The Chase Manhattan Bank, a National Banking Association v. The First Marion Bank, a Banking Corporation

Citations

  • 437 F.2d 1040
  • 8 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 783
  • 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[e]vidence of course of dealing and usage of trade was necessarily and properly admissible to explain, qualify, or supplement the provisions of this written agreement.”
  • discussing the doctrines of interpreting contracts and drafting mistakes according to the parties’ intentions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tuttle, Dyer, Simpson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.