Skip to main content
· 4/23/1984

The Belcher Company of Alabama, Inc. v. M/v Maratha Mariner, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc.

Citations

  • 724 F.2d 1161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “... Dutch law does not recognize the concept of maritime lien and, therefore, provides no mechanism by which such a lien can be enforced.”
  • no compelling reason to decline jurisdiction where court averts possibility of double liability
  • “This lien attaches when necessaries are ordered by and supplied to a charterer, unless the supplier has notice that the person who orders the necessaries lacked authority to do so.” (footnote omitted)
  • “Attachment does in many respects resemble arrest. In each proceeding the vessel is seized and it may later be sold to satisfy a judgment. In each, the vessel itself may be released and other security substituted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin, Randall, Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.