The Baker Group, L.C. v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, - in Re: The Baker Group, L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on rule 15(d) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and a corresponding state rule, both of which make filing of supplemental pleadings permissive, in holding that res judicata extends only to claims in existence when original action was brought
• relying on rule 15(d) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and a corresponding state rule, both of which make filing of supplemental pleadings permissive, in holding that res judicata extends only to claims in existence when original action was brought
• \It is well settled that claim preclusion does not apply to claims that did not arise until after the first suit was filed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).