· 3/6/1963
The Austin Company v. The United States
Citations
- 314 F.2d 518
- 161 Ct. Cl. 76
- 1963 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that plaintiff “was not under any compulsion to enter into the contract” and was therefore bound to perform in accordance with the specifications
- “[P]laintiff drew up the specifications and thereby undertook a firm obligation to perform thereunder. In this climate plaintiff must turn the same square corners as required of the Government and is bound by specifications of its own making.”
- contractor assumed risk of impossibility of substituted specifications it drafted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Whitaker, Laramore, Durfee, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.