The Austad Company, a South Dakota Corporation v. Pennie & Edmonds, a New York Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a law firm associate's three-day visit to the client's office for the purpose of reviewing documents was insufficient to show purposeful availment
• concluding that a law firm associate's three-day visit to the client's office for the purpose of reviewing documents was insufficient to show purposeful availment
• concluding that phone calls made to the client's home state, monthly billings mailed to the client's home state, and payments made from the client's home-state bank were not sufficient to subject an out-of- state law firm to personal jurisdiction
• “three-day visit by associate and law clerk as well as numerous phone calls was insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).