The Armory Revival Company v. Carlson, 96-3119 (1997)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plan administrator cannot ignore “readily available” information that is needed for review of a claim for benefits
• affirming district court’s award of benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).