The Andersons, Inc. v. Crotser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the mutual consent of farmer and elevator to roll ahead “substantially limits” the likelihood that a contract can be infinitely rolled
• classifying Eby as holding “that an allegation of infinite rollovers was sufficient to defeat a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).