Skip to main content
· 4/15/1862

The Amy Warwick

Citations

  • 1 F. Cas. 811
  • 24 Law Rep. 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that such photographs are generally considered subject to Evid.R. 403, but that “a stricter evidentiary standard” applies in capital cases
  • noting that photographs of victim’s injuries were probative of capital defendant’s intent and deliberation
  • adopting the facts as set forth by the Ohio Supreme Court
  • adopting the facts as set forth by the Ohio Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sprague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.