The Alice M. Drew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff “had an opportunity, which he chose not to take, for judicial review, and even for the presentation of evidence in the reviewing court to demonstrate procedural irregularities by the board”
• concluding that the plaintiff “had an opportunity, which he chose not to take, for judicial review, and even for the presentation of evidence in the reviewing court to demonstrate procedural irregularities by the board”
• stating that to have preclusive effect in federal court, the state administrative determination must satisfy the Utah Construction fairness requirements
• stating that to have preclusive effect in federal court, the state administrative determination must satisfy the Utah Construction fairness requirements
• concluding the plaintiff “had an opportunity, which he chose not to 13 take, for judicial review, and even for the presentation of evidence in the reviewing court 14 to demonstrate procedural irregularities by the board”
• rejecting plaintiff’s attempt to invoke supplemental jurisdiction to by-pass the state court’s authority to review the state administrative agency’s denial of a dental license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).