Thaut v. Finley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \it would be absurd indeed to maintain that one of the purposes of the statute in question was not to protect the public from the risk of injury\
• “it would be absurd indeed to maintain that one of the purposes of the statute in question was not to protect the public from the risk of injury”
• social hosts’ violation of statute prohibiting giving alcoholic beverage to minor social guests
• social hosts' violation of statute prohibiting giving alcoholic beverage to minor social guests
• violation of statute for illegal sale of alcohol is negligence per se
• where civil damage act inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).