Thatcher v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that named party and its assignee “must live with the consequence of failing to include similar language of assignability here”
• “[S]ilence [on assignment] is the functional equivalent of the parties’ express intent to exclude language of assignment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).