M.D. Tennessee· 1/9/1984

Thatcher v. Austin (In Re Austin)

Citations

36 B.R. 306
10 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 367
1984 Bankr. LEXIS 6485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that application of vicarious liability would effectively vitiate § 523(a)(6)’s requirement that only debts resulting from willful acts committed by the debtor be nondischargeable
refusing to impute intent through vicarious liability because “application of vicarious liability would effectively vitiate the § 523(a)(6) requirement that only debts resulting from willful acts committed by the debtor be nondischargeable”
refusing to impute intent through vicarious liability because “application of vicarious liability would effectively vitiate the § 523(a)(6) requirement that only debts resulting from willful acts committed by the debtor be nondischargeable”
“application of vicarious liability would effectively vitiate the § 523(a)(6) requirement that only debts resulting from willful acts committed by the debtor be nondischargeable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith M. Lundin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.