Thatcher v. Austin (In Re Austin)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that application of vicarious liability would effectively vitiate § 523(a)(6)’s requirement that only debts resulting from willful acts committed by the debtor be nondischargeable
• refusing to impute intent through vicarious liability because “application of vicarious liability would effectively vitiate the § 523(a)(6) requirement that only debts resulting from willful acts committed by the debtor be nondischargeable”
• refusing to impute intent through vicarious liability because “application of vicarious liability would effectively vitiate the § 523(a)(6) requirement that only debts resulting from willful acts committed by the debtor be nondischargeable”
• “application of vicarious liability would effectively vitiate the § 523(a)(6) requirement that only debts resulting from willful acts committed by the debtor be nondischargeable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).