Thatcher Heating Co. v. Burtis
Citations
- 121 U.S. 286
- 7 S. Ct. 1034
- 30 L. Ed. 942
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2052
Syllabus
<p>A combination of well-hnown separate elements, each of which, when combined, operates separately and in its old way, and in which no result is produced which cannot be assigned to the independent action of one or the other of the separate elements, is not patentable.</p> <p>Letters-patent No. 104,376, dated June 14,1870, granted tó John M. Thatcher for improvements in fireplace heaters, are not for a particular device for effecting the combination described in the patentees’ claim, but for the combination itself, no matter how or by what means it may be effected, and, as such, are void.</p>
Judges: Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court· 1942-01-05· cited 435×
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1894-01-08· cited 375×
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court· 1893-11-20· cited 174×
- Florsheim v. SchillingSupreme Court· 1890-11-10· cited 77×
- Palmer v. CorningSupreme Court· 1895-03-04· cited 37×
- Victor Cooler Door Co. v. Jamison Cold Storage Door Co.Fourth Circuit· 1930-10-21· cited 34×
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Eighth Circuit· 1930-09-05· cited 33×
- National Tube Co. v. AikenSixth Circuit· 1908-07-11· cited 23×
- Royer v. RothSupreme Court· 1889-11-25· cited 19×
- Gas Machinery Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co.Sixth Circuit· 1915-12-07· cited 16×
- American Tobacco Co. v. StreatFourth Circuit· 1897-11-03· cited 12×
- Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. Metropolitan Burglar Alarm Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1887-12-31· cited 9×
- Standard Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Eighth Circuit· 1922-10-02· cited 5×
- In Re FarrandCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1931-05-27· cited 4×
- Trico Products Corp. v. Rico Mfg. Co.D. Rhode Island· 1930-12-06· cited 4×
- Lektophone Corp. v. Rola Co.Ninth Circuit· 1929-09-23· cited 3×
- Waldes Kohinoor, Inc. v. Industrial Retaining Ring Co.D. New Jersey· 1961-11-01· cited 3×
- E. E. Johnson Co. v. Grinnell Washing Mach. Co.Seventh Circuit· 1916-01-04· cited 3×
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.W.D. Washington· 1923-11-21· cited 3×
- Dodge Coal Storage Co. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York· 1905-07-27· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1885-01-05· cited 193×
- Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court· 1885-03-23· cited 150×
- Heald v. RiceSupreme Court· 1882-03-18· cited 78×
- Gardner v. HerzSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 45×
- Beecher Manufacturing Co. v. Atwater Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1885-05-04· cited 21×
Other cases named Thatcher Heating Co. v. Burtis
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.