Skip to main content

Tharpe v. State

Citations

  • 955 N.E.2d 836
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1818
  • 2011 WL 4898083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an initial aggressor cannot claim self-defense unless he withdrew from the encounter and communicated his intent to do so to the other person
  • recognizing that an initial aggressor or a mutual combatant must withdraw from the encounter and communicate the intent to do so “before he may claim self-defense”
  • holding an appellant can argue fundamental error to overcome waiver of an issue
  • “Any prejudice from the judge’s facial expressions was cured when the judge admonished the jury to disregard them.”
  • “We presume juries follow the admonitions of the court and admonitions cure any prejudice resulting from an error.”
  • Defendant cannot prevail on self-defense if he “provoke[d], instigate[d], or participate[d] willingly in the violence . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.