Tharp v. Acacia Commc'ns, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing Lirette v. Shiva Corp., 27 F. Supp. 2d 268, 283 (D. Mass. 1998) (requiring a securities plaintiff to show that “sales by insiders were in fact unusual or suspicious in amount or timing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).