Tharp University School v. Komus Realty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of limitations accrued on the date that the appellate court overturned the plaintiff's conviction
• finding that police officers’ alleged coercion of individuals whose testimony was used to secure an arrest warrant rebutted presumption of probable cause
• noting that the plaintiff’s “criminal proceeding terminated in his favor . . . when the Appellate Division reversed his conviction” as against the weight of the evidence
• denying summary judgment on a Monell claim because a report or study evinced a municipal policy
• denying summary judgment on due process fabrication claim because of coerced eyewitness statement
• “A state law claim for malicious prosecution, like a federal claim, accrues on the date the criminal proceeding in question terminated in plaintiff's favor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).