Thaler Bros. v. Greisser Construction Co.
Citations
- 229 Pa. 512
- 79 A. 147
- 1911 Pa. LEXIS 522
Syllabus
<p>Mechanic’s claim, — Building contract — Arbitration by architect — Retention of certificate of approval — Good faith — Instructions of court.</p> <p>1. Where a subcontractor has entered into a contract with a construction company, the main contractor, to construct certain tubs for a brewery in course of erection, by the terms of which contract the construction company is expressly designated as “owner,” and it is provided that the work shall be done “under the direction and to the satisfaction of the construction company, architect, acting for the purposes of this contract as the agent of the owner,” with the further provision that “all payments shall be made upon written certificate of the architect that the payment has become due.” and the real owner seeks to defend against a sei. fa. sur mechanic’s lien for a balance due for work done on the ground that the work was deficient in several particulars and that the plaintiff has failed to produce a certificate from the architect that any balance is due, an instruction to the jury making the good faith of the construction company in withholding their approval of the work the test of the sufficiency of its defense is fair and proper.</p> <p>2. Such a case in its facts is to be treated rather as one in which work or material is to be satisfactory to the party acquiring it, than as one in which it must be satisfactory to a third party designated as arbiter.</p> <p>3. The physical production of the architect’s certificate in such a case is not an absolute prerequisite to the right of recovery.</p> <p>Evidence — Verdict—Inference of feigned dissatisfaction.</p> <p>4. A verdict for plaintiff on sci. fa. sur mechanic’s lien is sustained by evidence that the work was properly performed, that no specific reason was offered for the failure of the principal contractor to give a certificate of proper performance upon request, that after the completion of the work the owners expressed satisfaction with it and acknowledged their
Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Moschziskeb, Moschzisker, Potter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Hospital for Criminal Insane v. Consolidated Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-04-12· cited 67×
- Williams v. NotopolosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1918-01-07· cited 35×
- Curran v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-03-10· cited 22×
- Mills-Morris Co. v. Champion Spark Plug Co.Sixth Circuit· 1925-06-08· cited 20×
- Bonfitto v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-06-15· cited 5×
- Stuart & Peterson Co. v. NewtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-12-09· cited 2×
- Standard Construction Co. v. Quaker City Cracker Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-02-28· cited 1×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Singerly v. ThayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1885-10-05· cited 65×
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. FenlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1842-09-15· cited 40×
- Hostetter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1884-10-23· cited 29×
- Hunn v. Pennsylvania Institution for the Instruction of the BlindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-05-18· cited 19×
- Seeley v. WellesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-04-23· cited 15×
- Payne v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-04-09· cited 14×
- Sidney Sch. Furniture Co. v. Warsaw Sch. DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-11-04· cited 10×
- Reynolds v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1866-02-09· cited 9×
- Stutz v. Loyalhanna Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1890-01-06· cited 9×
- Howard v. SmedleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1891-02-16· cited 8×
- Brown v. DeckerPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1891-05-27· cited 6×
- Krum v. MersherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-04-11· cited 4×
- Loeper v. HaasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1904-01-21· cited 2×
- McNally v. Montour RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-02-25· cited 2×
- Thaler v. Wilhelm Griesser Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-07-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.