Skip to main content
· 8/1/2005

Thad A. Shafer v. Kal Kan Foods, Inc., and Alan Dill

Citations

  • 417 F.3d 663
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15750
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,037
  • 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 351
  • 2005 WL 1798295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff did not establish that the alleged harassing conduct \reflected more than personal animosity or juvenile behavior\
  • holding that plaintiff did not establish that the alleged harassing conduct “reflected more than personal animosity or juvenile behavior”
  • no discrimination where harasser “picked on anyone ... he could get away with tormenting”
  • no discrimination where harasser “picked on anyone ... he could get away with tormenting”
  • “Sexual horseplay differs from sex discrimination, and Title VII covers only discriminatory conduct.”
  • “Sexual horseplay differs from sex discrimination, and Title VII covers only discriminatory conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Bauer, éasterbrook, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.