· 8/1/2005
Thad A. Shafer v. Kal Kan Foods, Inc., and Alan Dill
Citations
- 417 F.3d 663
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15750
- 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,037
- 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 351
- 2005 WL 1798295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff did not establish that the alleged harassing conduct \reflected more than personal animosity or juvenile behavior\
- holding that plaintiff did not establish that the alleged harassing conduct “reflected more than personal animosity or juvenile behavior”
- no discrimination where harasser “picked on anyone ... he could get away with tormenting”
- no discrimination where harasser “picked on anyone ... he could get away with tormenting”
- “Sexual horseplay differs from sex discrimination, and Title VII covers only discriminatory conduct.”
- “Sexual horseplay differs from sex discrimination, and Title VII covers only discriminatory conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Bauer, éasterbrook, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.