Skip to main content

Thacker v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 134 Va. 767
  • 114 S.E. 504
  • 1922 Va. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “to do an act from general malevolence is not an attempt to commit a crime, because there is no specific intent, though the act according to its consequences may amount to a substantive crime”
  • “The law does not presume, because an assault was made with a weapon likely to produce death, that it was an assault with the intent to murder.”
  • “The law does not presume, because an assault was made with a weapon likely to produce death, that it was an assault with the intent to murder.”
  • “The law does not presume, because an assault was made with a weapon likely to produce death, that it was an assault with the intent to murder.”
  • “The law does not presume, because an assault was made with a weapon likely to produce death, that it was an assault with the intent to murder.”
  • “The law does not presume, because an assault was made with a weapon likely to produce death, that it was an assault with the intent to murder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Thacker v. Commonwealth

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.