Skip to main content
· 8/22/2016

T.H. v. DHS J.R. v. DHS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that the court “apply the best-interest framework set out in section 232.116(2) to decide if the grounds for termination should result in a termination of parental rights”
  • interpreting the term “at the present time” to mean “at the time of the termination hearing”
  • interpreting the term “at the present time” to mean “at the time of the termination hearing”
  • interpreting the statutory language “at the present time” to mean “at the time of the termination hearing”
  • interpreting “at the present time” to mean at the time of the termination hearing
  • interpreting the statutory 2 The parental rights of any putative father were also terminated. No father appeals. 4 language “at the present time” to mean “at the time of the termination hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohn Jubelirer, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.