· 8/22/2016
T.H. v. DHS J.R. v. DHS
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that the court “apply the best-interest framework set out in section 232.116(2) to decide if the grounds for termination should result in a termination of parental rights”
- interpreting the term “at the present time” to mean “at the time of the termination hearing”
- interpreting the term “at the present time” to mean “at the time of the termination hearing”
- interpreting the statutory language “at the present time” to mean “at the time of the termination hearing”
- interpreting “at the present time” to mean at the time of the termination hearing
- interpreting the statutory 2 The parental rights of any putative father were also terminated. No father appeals. 4 language “at the present time” to mean “at the time of the termination hearing”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cohn Jubelirer, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.