Skip to main content
· 6/30/1999

Th v. Department of Children & Fam.

Citations

  • 736 So. 2d 126
  • 1999 WL 436561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding order was non-final where order reserved jurisdiction to determine integrally-related visitation and child support issues
  • holding order in dependency proceeding was non-final where order reserved jurisdiction to determine integrally-related visitation and support issues
  • holding order was nonfinal where order reserved jurisdiction to determine issues integrally related to those issues resolved by order on appeal even though issues had not been specifically pled by the parties
  • dismissing as nonfinal an order which purported to address certain matters but reserved jurisdiction on an integrally related matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.