Skip to main content
· 1/23/2015

Textron Inc. v. Acument Global Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 108 A.3d 1208
  • 2015 Del. LEXIS 41
  • 2015 WL 307770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a trial court’s review of extrinsic evidence “is entitled to deference on appeal”
  • distinguishing between a “typical stock sale” and a “typical asset sale”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine, Holland, Vaughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.