Textile Rubber & Chemical Co. v. Thermo-Flex Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s anticipatory repudiation of $3 million contract for sale of carpet-making technology allowed plaintiff “to issue a demand for the face value of the total remaining unpaid debt”
• defendant could not rely upon disclaimer provision where he was “not simply acting as an agent” for the corporate defendant, but also served as a consultant and expert to the corporate plaintiff that relied upon his representations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).