Texas v. Real Parties in Interest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Rule 202 proceeding is “merely an investigatory tool” and, as such, is not removable under the All Writs Act
• holding that the Rule 202 proceeding is “merely an investigatory tool” and, as such, is not removable under the All Writs Act
• recognizing that a number of courts have interpreted the All Writs Act to \permit a dis- trict court to enjoin actions in state court . . . only where necessary to prevent relitigation of an existing federal judgment or otherwise to protect federal court orders.\
• “In order to bring the proceeding before the [federal] court . . . , Private Counsel ‘removed’ the proceeding directly to the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division.”
• reviewing the enactment history of § 1441

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).