· 1/25/2016
Texas v. Davis
Citations
- 136 S. Ct. 981
- 194 L. Ed. 2d 4
- 84 U.S.L.W. 3415
- 2016 U.S. LEXIS 934
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that delay in prescription was not Eighth Amendment violation because delay was inadvertent and quickly rectified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.