Skip to main content
· 6/5/2002

Texas Sting, Ltd. v. R.B. Foods, Inc.

Citations

  • 82 S.W.3d 644
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 4003
  • 2002 WL 1225274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the absence of a purposeful or bad faith failure to answer is the controlling factor under the first prong of Craddock
  • noting that the absence of a purposeful or bad faith failure to answer is the controlling factor under the first prong of Craddock
  • concluding even a complete absence of notice can be cured when a trial court holds a hearing on a motion to reinstate
  • trial court did not abuse discretion in dismissing case due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute diligently when only evidence challenging dismissal involved trial court’s failure to comply with notice requirements, rather than evidence of diligent prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Green, Marion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.