Texas Rivers Protection Ass'n v. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellants had standing under Section 2001.171 to challenge permit for diversion because their riparian ownership alone was sufficient to “distinguish[] their injury from that of the public at large”
• “Standing to assert a constitutional violation depends on whether the claimant asserts a particularized, concrete injury.”
• “potential harm” to riparian property owners and canoe guides from lowering river levels was sufficient to confer standing
• riparian property owners and canoe guides had standing to challenge agency action that would lower river levels
• riparian property owners and canoe guides had standing to challenge agency action that would lower river levels
• “potential harm” to riparian property owners and canoe guides from lowering river levels was sufficient to confer standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).