Skip to main content
· 3/8/1950

Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Hunt

Citations

  • 228 S.W.2d 151
  • 149 Tex. 33
  • 228 S.W.2d 150
  • 1950 Tex. LEXIS 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the supposition that market value might be adversely affected by the existence of the pipeline is not unreasonable
  • noting that the supposition that market value might be adversely affected by the existence of the pipeline is not unreasonable
  • noting that the issue of depreciated market value is largely a matter of opinion evidence and that all opinion is ―at best something of a speculation‖
  • noting that the issue of depreciated market value is largely a matter of opinion evidence and that all opinion is “at best something of a speculation”
  • holding that an assumption that a pipeline may affect a property‘s market value ―is hardly less reasonable‖ than a supposition ―that an electric power line across a tract may reduce its market value by reason of interference with radio reception of future dwellers on the tract‖
  • holding that an assumption that a pipeline may affect a property’s market value “is hardly less reasonable” than a supposition “that an electric power line across a tract may reduce its market value by reason of interference with radio reception of future dwellers on the tract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.