· 3/8/1950
Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Hunt
Citations
- 228 S.W.2d 151
- 149 Tex. 33
- 228 S.W.2d 150
- 1950 Tex. LEXIS 404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the supposition that market value might be adversely affected by the existence of the pipeline is not unreasonable
- noting that the supposition that market value might be adversely affected by the existence of the pipeline is not unreasonable
- noting that the issue of depreciated market value is largely a matter of opinion evidence and that all opinion is ―at best something of a speculation‖
- noting that the issue of depreciated market value is largely a matter of opinion evidence and that all opinion is “at best something of a speculation”
- holding that an assumption that a pipeline may affect a property‘s market value ―is hardly less reasonable‖ than a supposition ―that an electric power line across a tract may reduce its market value by reason of interference with radio reception of future dwellers on the tract‖
- holding that an assumption that a pipeline may affect a property’s market value “is hardly less reasonable” than a supposition “that an electric power line across a tract may reduce its market value by reason of interference with radio reception of future dwellers on the tract”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.