Texas Peanut Farmers v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \unsupported conclusions of a complaint are not considered admitted and are not sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss\
• “[W]hen the [Ohio Adult Parole Authority] is vested with discretion whether to grant parole to an offender, the offender has ‘no expectancy of parole or a constitutional liberty interest sufficient to establish a right of procedural due process.’ ”
• analyzing alleged breach of plea agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).