Skip to main content
· 1/13/1902

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Callender

Citations

  • 183 U.S. 632
  • 22 S. Ct. 257
  • 46 L. Ed. 362
  • 1902 U.S. LEXIS 741

Syllabus

<p>This action was brought by defendants in error to recover the value of 187 bales of cotton destroyed in the fire mentioned in Texas & Pacific Pail-way Company v. Reiss, ante, 621. The facts as to the manner of doing business at Westwego are the same as those stated in that case, and also in the case of the same company v. Clayton, 173 U. S. 348. The bill of lading contained the following clauses: “ 1. No carrier or party in possession of all or any of the property herein described shall be liable for any loss thereof or damage thereto by causes beyond its control; . . . or for loss or damage to property of any kind at any place occurring by fire or from any cause except the negligence of the carrier.” “3. No carrier shall be liable for loss or damage not occurring on its own road or its portion of the through route, nor after said property’is ready for delivery to the next carrier or to consignee. . . .” “4. . . . Cotton is excepted from any clause herein on the subject of fire, and the carrier shall be liable as at common law for loss or damage of cotton by fire. . . .” “ 11. No carrier shall be liable for delay, nor in any other respect than as warehousemen, while the said property awaits further conveyance, and in case the whole or any part of the property specified herein be prevented by any cause from going from said port in the first steamer, of the ocean line above stated, leaving after the arrival of such property at said port, the carrier hereunder then in possession is at liberty to .forward said property by succeeding steamer of said line, or, if deemed necessary, by any other steamer. 12. This contract is executed and accomplished, and all liability hereunder terminates, on the delivery of the said property to the steamship, her master, agent or servants, or to the steamship company, or, on the steamship pier at the said port, and the inland freight charges shall be a first lien, due-and payable by the steamship company.” Held:</p> <p>(1) That the mea

Judges: Peckham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.