Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Railsback
Citations
- 124 La. 36
- 49 So. 975
- 1909 La. LEXIS 420
Syllabus
<p>Courts (§ 224*) — Supreme Court — Jurisdiction — Amount Involved — Expropriation.</p> <p>In an expropriation case, where it is not pretended that the value of the property involved exceeds $1,250, and the claim for damages set up by defendant is manifestly without foundation, and no attempt is made to sustain it by proof, this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing ERISA claim because the plaintiff lacked standing “[i]n light of the clear, unambiguous language” of the plan at issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.