Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Texas had standing to challenge the Federal Communication Commission’s regulation over an aspect of telecommunications that Texas believed it controlled
• holding that Texas had standing to challenge the Federal Communication Commission’s regulation over an aspect of telecommunications that Texas believed it controlled
• noting \the sorts of implicit subsidies currently used by the FCC in its [DEM] weighting program\
• discussing Section 214(e)(2) and concluding that “nothing in the statute ... prohibits states from imposing their own eligibility requirements”
• discussing Section 214(e)(2) and concluding that \nothing in the statute . . . prohibits states from imposing their own eligibility requirements\
• challenging an FCC’s assertion of authority to refer telecommunications carriers to the states to seek recovery of certain intrastate contributions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).