Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. Sierra Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission was the \proper defendant\ when plaintiff sought judicial review of agency’s order
• holding that court violated separation of powers doctrine when it reversed and remanded case with instructions
• holding that APA section 2001.176(b)(2) controlled service on parties other than Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission and that Sierra Club had complied by providing copy of petition to all parties to commission proceeding
• holding that APA section 2001.176(b)(2) controlled service on parties other than Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission and that Sierra Club had complied by providing copy of petition to all parties to commission proceeding
• clarifying that APA section 2002.176(b)(2) controlled service on parties other than TNRCC defendant, which required actual service of citation under Solid Waste Disposal Act
• holding that in suit for judicial review, only agency “whose ruling is to be appealed” was “proper defendant to the district court proceeding” when neither APA nor enabling statute required service of citation on any other party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).