Texas Keystone Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation & Natural Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lack of ripeness impacts subject matter jurisdiction, a matter to be raised sua sponte by the court
• considering question of ripeness despite omission from preliminary objections and explaining that “since lack of ripeness goes to our subject matter jurisdiction, we may raise the issue sua sponte”
• “ripeness doctrine insists on a more concrete context, i.e., one involving a final agency action and a factual record that would allow this Court to properly review [the] substantive claims”
• “The ripeness doctrine insists on a more concrete context, i.e., one involving a final agency action and a factual record that would allow this Court to properly review [the] substantive claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).