Skip to main content
· 6/24/1999

Texas Health Enterprises, Inc. v. Geisler

Citations

  • 9 S.W.3d 163
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 4654
  • 1999 WL 428005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Adding prejudgment interest to the actual damages award and then imposing the statutory cap on this aggregate amount yields the same result forbidden by the supreme court when it said prejudgment interest could not be awarded on damages.”
  • \Adding prejudgment interest to the actual damages award and then imposing the statutory cap on this aggregate amount yields the same result forbidden by the supreme court when it said prejudgment interest could not be awarded on damages.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Richards, Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.