Texas General Petroleum Corp. v. Evans (In Re Texas General Petroleum Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the creditor did not satisfy the foregoing requirement, because it was “trying to exercise the avoidance power for itself as a sole creditor, not for the benefit of the debtor’s estate or the creditors as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).