· 9/11/2003
Texas Development Co. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
Citations
- 119 S.W.3d 875
- 52 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 61
- 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 8000
- 2003 WL 22103183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “essence” of contract for “design, fabrication, and installation” of oil rig modifications was for service, not sale of goods
- ruling that Exxon’s anti-assignment clause in its agreement with IRC Structures and Systems (“IRC”) for services on an Exxon drilling rig is enforceable to void IRC’s assignment of its right to receive payment for services performed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: III, Arnot, Wright, McCall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.