Skip to main content
· 9/11/2003

Texas Development Co. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Citations

  • 119 S.W.3d 875
  • 52 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 61
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 8000
  • 2003 WL 22103183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “essence” of contract for “design, fabrication, and installation” of oil rig modifications was for service, not sale of goods
  • ruling that Exxon’s anti-assignment clause in its agreement with IRC Structures and Systems (“IRC”) for services on an Exxon drilling rig is enforceable to void IRC’s assignment of its right to receive payment for services performed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, Arnot, Wright, McCall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.