TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES v. Holmes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not err in denying plea to the jurisdiction and deferring its determination of alleged constitutional violation \until the case could be more fully developed\
• holding that trial court did not err in denying plea to the jurisdiction and deferring its determination of alleged constitutional violation “until the case could be more fully developed”
• rejecting appellate challenge to temporary injunction preserving applicant's right to continue using laser hair removal device on basis that such use was illegal
• allegations that commissioner exceeded authority invoked ultra vires exception to immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).