Texas Department of Public Safety v. Alford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that whether there is substantial evidence to support an administrative decision is a question of law
• concluding there was substantial evidence to support ALJ’s decision even though the ALJ referenced the wrong citation for the implied consent statute in its findings
• explaining that appellate courts do not defer to trial court’s judgment that agency order satisfies substantial-evidence standard
• noting that ALJ’s findings are entitled to deference but that “whether there is substantial evidence to support an administrative decision is a question of law” and as such, neither trial court nor ALJ’s determination of issue is entitled to deference on appeal
• noting that ALJ’s findings are entitled to deference but that “whether there is substantial evidence to support an administrative decision is a question of law” and as such, neither county court nor ALJ’s determination of issue is entitled to deference on appeal
• noting that the ALJ’s findings are entitled to deference but that “whether there is substantial evidence to support an administrative decision is a question of law” and as such, neither county court nor the ALJ’s determination of issue is entitled to deference on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).