Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court did not abuse its discretion by tracking the statutory language in the instruction
• holding trial court is not required to ask jury to specify ground on which it relied to answer question in jury charge
• analyzing the application of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 277 to a jury charge complaint in a termination case
• interpreting “whenever feasible” as mandating broad-form submission “in any or every instance in which it is capable of being accomplished”
• analyzing the application of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 277 to a jury charge complaint in a termination case
• interpreting “whenever feasible” as mandating broad-form submission “in any or every instance in which it is capable of being accomplished”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).