Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v. N.J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial judge’s exclusion of the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest test on Daubert-Lanigan grounds based on the judge’s finding that the test was neither generally accepted in the relevant scientific community nor a reliable measure of sexual interest
• expert testimony on sexual interest diagnostic test properly excluded where test did not concern issues before jury
• trial judge properly concluded that the “Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest [AASI]” test was neither generally accepted in the relevant scientific community nor demonstrated to be reliable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).