Texas Commerce Bank, National Ass'n v. New

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in no-answer default judgment, affidavits, as unobjected-to hearsay, constitute probative evidence, thereby satisfying Rule 243’s requirement that there be evidence of unliquidated damages
• holding that in a no‑answer default judgment, affidavits can satisfy rule 243 > s requirement of evidence of unliquidated damages
• holding that hearsay constitutes probative evidence in support of a default judgment and satisfies the requirement of evidence of unliquidated damages
• holding that in a no-answer default judgment, affidavits can satisfy rule 243‘s requirement of evidence of unliquidated damages
• recognizing that affidavit testimony of total amount due under written instrument is legally sufficient to support award of that amount in default judgment
• holding that, in no-answer default judgment, affidavits, as unobjected-to hearsay, constitute probative evidence, thereby satisfying Rule 243’ s requirement that there be evidence of unliquidated damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).